Volume 11, Issue 3 (8-2020)
JAP 2020, 11(3): 77-87 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Jafarnezhadgero A, Ghane G, Valizadeh orang A, Mokhtari malek abadi A. A comparison of planatar pressure variables during three differnt
running patterns in pronated feet individuals with and without
low back pain. JAP 2020; 11 (3) :77-87
URL: http://jap.iums.ac.ir/article-1-5509-en.html
URL: http://jap.iums.ac.ir/article-1-5509-en.html
1- University of Mohaghegh Ardabili , amiralijafarnezhad@gmail.com
2- University of Mohaghegh Ardabili
2- University of Mohaghegh Ardabili
Abstract: (1354 Views)
Aims and background: Individuals with pronated feet suffer from many biomechanical dysfunctions during
running. The purpose of this study was to compare the peak plantar pressure in ten areas of the foot, ground
reaction force, center of pressure and loading rate during three different running patterns between healthy subjects
and pronated feet individuals with and without LBP.
Materials and methods: This semi-experimental and laboratory study was performed as a comparative research
between three groups including healthy subjects (n=10), pronated feet individuals with (n=10) and without (n=10)
low back pain. Plantar pressure variables were evaluated in 10 areas of the foot. Statistical analysis was performed
using MANOVA test at a significance level of 0.05.
Findings: The loading rate was significantly different between the three groups during running. There was a
significant difference in loading rate in the mid-foot running pattern between the pronated feet individuals with
and without low back pain. The loading rate in the pronated individuals with low back pain was higher in the
mid-foot running pattern than in the rear-foot running pattern.
Conclusion: The forefoot running pattern compared with other running patterns is more suitable for pronated feet
individuals with low back pain. However, further study is warranted.
running. The purpose of this study was to compare the peak plantar pressure in ten areas of the foot, ground
reaction force, center of pressure and loading rate during three different running patterns between healthy subjects
and pronated feet individuals with and without LBP.
Materials and methods: This semi-experimental and laboratory study was performed as a comparative research
between three groups including healthy subjects (n=10), pronated feet individuals with (n=10) and without (n=10)
low back pain. Plantar pressure variables were evaluated in 10 areas of the foot. Statistical analysis was performed
using MANOVA test at a significance level of 0.05.
Findings: The loading rate was significantly different between the three groups during running. There was a
significant difference in loading rate in the mid-foot running pattern between the pronated feet individuals with
and without low back pain. The loading rate in the pronated individuals with low back pain was higher in the
mid-foot running pattern than in the rear-foot running pattern.
Conclusion: The forefoot running pattern compared with other running patterns is more suitable for pronated feet
individuals with low back pain. However, further study is warranted.
Type of Study: Original |
Subject:
Chronic pain managment
Received: 2020.03.15 | Accepted: 2020.07.10 | Published: 2020.08.31
Received: 2020.03.15 | Accepted: 2020.07.10 | Published: 2020.08.31
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
