دوره 3، شماره 1 - ( بهار 1391 )                   جلد 3 شماره 1 صفحات 0-81 | برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها

XML English Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Behrouz Zaman, Alirezqa Siamdoust, Reza Tarjoman M A F I M A. Comparison of sedative effect of remifentanil with propofol in senile cataract surgery under retrobulbar block. JAP 2012; 3 (1) :81-0
URL: http://jap.iums.ac.ir/article-1-43-fa.html
علیمیان مهزاد، ایمانی فرناد، آل بویه محمودرضا، زمان بهروز، صیام دوست علیرضا، پرشکوه رضا. مقایسه اثرات سداتیو رمیفنتانیل با پروپوفول در اعمال جراحی کاتاراکت سالمندان تحت بلوک موضعی رترو بولبار. بیهوشی و درد. 1391; 3 (1) :81-0

URL: http://jap.iums.ac.ir/article-1-43-fa.html


چکیده:   (5185 مشاهده)

Background:

Because general anesthesia is not a good choice in elderly ASA>II patients candidate for cataract surgery performored by ophthalmology Residents and lack of cooperation in these patients, sedative effect and hemodynamic status and side effects of two drugs, Remifentanil & propofol  are compared.

 

Methods :

In a Randomized clinical trial on 60 patients candidate for cataract surgery which were divided in two group each containing 30 patients were compared. In group A (remifentanil group), patients were sedated with a bolus dose of 0.5 µg/kg within 1 minute , and maintenance dose of 0.05 µg/kg/min. In group B ( propofol  group) ,  patients were sedated with a bolus dose of 0.25 µg/kg, and maintenance dose of 25 µg/kg/min. After retrobulbar block was performored for all the patients by residents. Hemodynamic responses, including  HR , DBP , SBP  and O2Sat and sedation level according to MOAA/SS  were measured .

Modified Observers Assessment of Awareness/Sedation Scale   =   MOAA/SS           

 

Results:

 Sedation was deeper in  group A  (Remifentanil ) measured in all times after Block and were statistically meaningful (p<0.05) .The heart rate was  reduced in  group A after 20 minutes after Block and were statistically meaningful ( p<0.05). 7 Cases  in group A ( Remifentanil ) had  nausea after drug administration  (P=0.011).

Conclusion:

 Remifentanil can induce high level of sedation for patients compare to propofol. But Nausea could be troublesome and in this point propofol has less adverse effect.

 

متن کامل [PDF 315 kb]   (3096 دریافت)    
نوع مطالعه: پژوهشي | موضوع مقاله: عمومى
پذیرش: 1397/9/19 | انتشار: 1397/9/19

ارسال نظر درباره این مقاله : نام کاربری یا پست الکترونیک شما:
CAPTCHA

بازنشر اطلاعات
Creative Commons License این مقاله تحت شرایط Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License قابل بازنشر است.

کلیه حقوق این وب سایت متعلق به بیهوشی و درد می باشد.

طراحی و برنامه نویسی : یکتاوب افزار شرق

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Anesthesiology and Pain

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb